Inside the Asian Institute of Management, Joseph Plazo—founder of the algorithmic trading firm Plazo Sullivan Roche—offered an unusual message: slow down.
From Manila, where financial optimism runs high — He didn’t celebrate victory margins or machine performance.
“If you hand over your portfolio to a machine,” he said, “you must ask: does it reflect your ethics—or just your ambitions?”
???? **The Man Behind the Model—Now Questioning Its Impact**
He’s not critiquing technology from a safe distance. His firm’s AI systems have posted a 99% win rate across key timeframes and are in use by institutional clients across Europe and Asia.
Still, he asks: what happens when efficiency erases human context?
“Optimisation is only part of the equation,” Plazo explained. “Direction, purpose—those remain human.”
He shared a case from the early days of the pandemic. One of his firm’s bots flagged a short on gold just before the U.S. Federal Reserve issued an emergency policy shift.
“We overrode it. It understood signals. But not sentiment.”
???? **When Pausing Is a Form of Leadership**
Traders are trained to move quickly—too quickly.
“We must remember that a moment of hesitation can protect reputations—and futures.”
Plazo read more introduced a framework he calls **“Conviction Calculus”**—three questions that must be asked before executing an AI recommendation:
- Who takes responsibility if the code is flawless—but the outcome disastrous?
- Is there non-digital confirmation? What do experience, memory, and culture say?
- Does leadership end when the model takes over?
???? **Asia’s Race Toward AI Could Be Missing Its Compass**
Across Asia, nations are investing heavily in fintech and AI-driven innovation. From Singapore to South Korea, the push toward automation is framed as economic strategy.
But Plazo’s question cuts deeper: “Are we building intelligence without wisdom?”
He cited the 2024 collapse of two Hong Kong hedge funds.
“No one made a mistake. But no one questioned the machine either.”
???? **The Alternative: Narrative AI That Considers More Than Numbers**
Plazo is not anti-AI. He’s pro-responsibility.
His firm is developing what he calls **“narrative-integrated AI”**—models that factor in geopolitics, tone, and social context alongside market data.
“We don’t need more speed. We need better questions.”
That idea is already drawing attention.
One investor called Plazo’s talk:
“A blueprint for ethical AI in an unequal world.”
???? **What Happens When No One Says ‘Stop’**
Plazo ended with a thought that may echo across boardrooms:
“We won’t be victims of chaos—but of unchecked confidence.”
Not a warning against AI—but a demand for wisdom to go with it.
Because when machines take over the trades, conscience cannot be coded out.